Evaluation of Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrests in Births and Neonates: Opportunities to Improve Care

INTRODUCTION: Home births have increased 77% from 2004 to 2017 and further increased with the COVID-19 pandemic. While the majority of home births are uneventful, some are complicated and require attendance of emergency medical services (EMS). Understanding characteristics of out-of-hospital births and EMS care is increasingly important to improve care. METHODS: We conducted a chart review of pediatric out-of-hospital cardiac arrests (POHCAs) from EMS agencies across the United States to evaluate the care provided by first responders. The study was approved by Oregon Health & Science University and respective IRBs. RESULTS: Of 1,020 POHCAs, 54 were responses to births and 43 were for other neonates. While most neonatal POHCAs occurred in a home or residence (84%), some births occurred at other locations such as a health care facility, public or commercial building, and street or highway. Bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation was performed in less than half of births but more than half of other neonates. Return of spontaneous circulation was twice as likely for births as for other neonates (27% versus 13%). Overall, serious adverse safety events were observed in three-fourths of neonatal resuscitations. Births were more likely to be associated with failure to follow the correct resuscitation algorithm and lack of positive pressure ventilation. CONCLUSION: There are unique challenges in the care of out-of-hospital births for the EMS system. There is an opportunity to improve use of neonatal resuscitation protocols and early ventilation. [ FROM AUTHOR] Copyright of Obstetrics & Gynecology is the property of Lippincott Williams & Wilkins and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full . (Copyright applies to all s.)

Changes in Advanced Cardiac Life Support Applications in Adult Patient During COVID-19 Pandemia

The Coronavirus Disease-2019 (COVID-19), which was first seen in Wuhan, China and later declared a pandemic by the World Health Organization on March 11, 2020, spread all over the world in a short time. COVID-19 infection is currently the most important public health problem in the world. COVID-19 infection emerges as a systemic disease, not just a respiratory system disease. Cardiac involvement is one of them, and it gives clinical findings in a wide range from myocardial infarction to cardiac arrest. COVID-19 infection patients are at risk for cardiac arrest and the mortality rate of these patients is also high. The most important intervention in cardiac arrest is advanced cardiac life support, which includes a range of treatments and clinical applications, applied to save lives and provide emergency care. In advanced cardiac life support, aerosol emission occurs during many applications such as chest compression, positive pressure ventilation and airway support. Healthcare workers at risk for infection during advanced cardiac life support are even more at risk for COVID-19 infection patients. In this case, an adequate, effective and safe advanced cardiac life support will provide both an increase in survival rates and protection of healthcare workers from infection. This review includes current guideline recommendations for the provision of effective and safe advanced cardiac life support in adult patients with probable or confirmed COVID-19 infection. © 2023, Dokuz Eylul University. All rights reserved.

COVID-19-specific adult basic life support guideline strategies for chiropractors and other healthcare providers to maximize the safety and efficacy of resuscitation: a commentary.

BACKGROUND: The emergence of an unprecedented novel severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-C0V-2), which causes the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, has created new scenarios in basic life support (BLS) management. According to current evidence, SARS-CoV-2 can be transmitted airborne in aerosol particles during resuscitation. Research evidence found an alarming global increase in out-of-hospital cardiac arrests during the COVID-19 pandemic. Healthcare providers are legally obliged to respond to cardiac arrest as soon as possible. Chiropractors will likely encounter potential exercise-related and non-exercise-related cardiac emergencies at some point in their professional lives. They have a duty of care to respond to emergencies such as cardiac arrest. Chiropractors are increasingly involved in providing care, including emergency care, for athletes and spectators at sporting events. Also, exercise-related cardiac arrest in adult patients may occur during exercise testing or rehabilitation with exercise prescriptions in chiropractic and other healthcare settings. Little is known about the COVID-19 BLS guidelines for chiropractors. Knowledge of the current COVID-19-specific adult BLS guidelines is essential to developing an emergency response plan for the on-field and sideline management of exercise-related cardiac arrest and non-athletic, non-exercise-related cardiac arrest. MAIN TEXT: Seven peer-reviewed articles on the COVID-19-specific BLS guidelines, including two updates, were reviewed for this commentary. Responding to the COVID-19 pandemic, the national and international resuscitation organizations recommended interim COVID-19-specific BLS guidelines with precaution, resuscitation, and education strategies. BLS safety is paramount. A precautionary approach with the bare minimum of appropriate personal protective equipment for resuscitation is recommended. There was disagreement among the COVID-19 BLS guidelines on the level of personal protective equipment. All healthcare professionals should also undergo self-directed BLS e-learning and virtual skill e-training. The summarized COVID-19-specific adult BLS guideline strategies and protocols are tabled, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: This commentary provides a practical overview and highlights current evidence-based intervention strategies of the COVID-19-specific adult BLS guidelines that may help chiropractors and other healthcare providers reduce BLS-related exposures to SARS-CoV-2 and the risks of SARS-CoV-2 transmission and maximize the efficacy of resuscitation. This study is relevant to and impacts future COVID-19-related research in areas such as infection prevention and control.

Dental Professionals' Awareness on Updated Guidelines for Basic Life Support in COVID-19 Patients

Background Members of dental fraternity have a duty of care to provide safe services to the patients. The satisfactory performance in a medical emergency in dental practice has wide-range implications. But, in the current scenario, the challenge is to ensure that patients with or without coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), who undergo any medical emergency, get the best possible chance of survival without compromising the safety of rescuers, who will be needed to take care for future patients.Aim This article assesses the awareness and knowledge on interim guidelines for Basic Life Support in adults with suspected or confirmed COVID-19 among various dental health care professionals.Materials and Methods An online questionnaire-based survey was conducted;framed in Google Forms and sent to various dental health care professionals through WhatsApp, email, and other means. Results were then analyzed and are presented in the form of frequency and percentage.Results In the study, 224 responders were included comprising undergraduates, postgraduates, and dental practitioners. Dismally, none of them had complete knowledge on the interim guidance for Basic Life Support for suspected or confirmed COVID-19 patients.Conclusion The study suggests that updated interim guidelines were unknown to maximum percentage of dental professionals which implies that there is need to keep ourselves up-to-date to provide safe services.

Effect of Contact-Restricted Basic Life Support Training During the Nation's Contact Restriction Policy on Learning Outcomes.

Objective: Basic life support (BLS) training aimed at building knowledge and skills in cardiopulmonary resuscitation. During training, there is the possibility of airborne COVID-19 transmission. The aim was to evaluate students' knowledge, skills, and course satisfaction following contact-restricted BLS training under the contact restriction policy. Methods: From July 2020 to January 2021, a prospective, descriptive study was conducted among fifth-year dental students. Contact-restricted BLS training consisted of online learning, online pre-testing, non-contact training with automated real-time feedback manikins, and remote monitoring. The participants' skills, knowledge through online testing, and course satisfaction were all evaluated after training. At three months and six months after training, their knowledge was re-evaluated through online testing. Results: Fifty-five participants were included in this study. Their mean (SD) knowledge scores after training, at three and six months, were 81.5 (10.8)%, 71.1 (16.4)%, and 65.8 (14.5)%, respectively. The percentage of participants, who passed the skills test on their first, second, and third attempts had been 83.6%, 94.5%, and 100%, respectively. The mean (SD) satisfaction score with the course was 4.87 (0.34) on a five-point Likert score. After training, no participants had COVID-19 infection. Conclusion: Training in contact-restricted BLS had produced acceptable knowledge, skills, and satisfaction results. Knowledge tests, competence tests, and course satisfaction were comparable to conventional pre-pandemic trainings with similar participants. Due to the significant dangers of aerosol disease transmission, it became a viable training alternative. Trial Registration: TCTR20210503001 (Thai Clinical Trials Registry).

Extracorporeal life support in pandemics

Pandemic diseases have inflicted significant morbidity and mortality on humankind throughout history, often from acute respiratory failure due to pneumonia and the acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) has been used for the management of patients with ARDS during pandemics of the 21st century, including both the influenza A (H1N1) and coronavirus disease 2019 pandemics. While ECMO has been shown to improve outcomes in ARDS, it is resource intensive. During pandemic conditions, demand for ECMO has often outnumbered access and availability. In light of such limitation, healthcare systems, medical societies, and national governments have, at times, standardized approaches to and coordinated care of patients requiring ECMO in attempts to optimize patient outcomes and access to ECMO. © 2023 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Comparison of extended reality and conventional methods of basic life support training: protocol for a multinational, pragmatic, noninferiority, randomised clinical trial (XR BLS trial).

BACKGROUND: Conventional cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) training for the general public involves the use of a manikin and a training video, which has limitations related to a lack of realism and immersion. To overcome these limitations, virtual reality and extended reality technologies are being used in the field of medical education. The aim of this study is to explore the efficacy and safety of extended reality (XR)-based basic life support (BLS) training. METHODS: This study is a prospective, multinational, multicentre, randomised controlled study. Four institutions in 4 countries will participate in the study. A total of 154 participants will be randomly assigned to either the XR group or the conventional group stratified by institution and sex (1:1 ratio). Each participant who is allocated to either group will be sent to a separate room to receive training with an XR BLS module or conventional CPR training video. All participants will perform a test on a CPR manikin after the training. The primary outcome will be mean compression depth. The secondary outcome will be overall BLS performance, including compression rate, correct hand position, compression, and full release and hands-off time. DISCUSSION: Using virtual reality (VR) to establish a virtual educational environment can give trainees a sense of realism. In the XR environment, which combines the virtual world with the real world, trainees can more effectively learn various skills. This trial will provide evidence of the usefulness of XR in CPR education. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04736888. Registered on 29 January 2021.

Efficacy of distance training program for cardiopulmonary resuscitation utilizing smartphone application and home delivery system.

AIM OF THE STUDY: Community cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) education is important for laypersons. However, during the COVID-19 pandemic, with social distancing, conventional face-to-face CPR training was unavailable. We developed a distance learning CPR training course (HEROS-Remote) using a smartphone application that monitors real-time chest compression quality and a home delivery collection system for mannikins. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of the HEROS-Remote course by comparing chest compression quality with that of conventional CPR training. METHODS: We applied layperson CPR education with HEROS-Remote and conventional education in Seoul during the COVID-19 pandemic. Both groups underwent a 2-min post-training chest compression test, and we tested non-inferiority. Chest compression depth, rate, complete recoil, and composite chest compression score was measured. Trainees completed a satisfaction survey on CPR education and delivery. The primary outcome was the mean chest compression depth. RESULTS: A total of 180 trainees were enrolled, with 90 assigned to each training group. Chest compression depth of HEROS-Remote training showed non-inferiority to that of conventional training (67.4 vs. 67.8, p = 0.78), as well as composite chest compression score (92.7 vs. 95.5, p = 0.16). The proportions of adequate chest compression depth, chest compression rate, and chest compressions with complete chest recoil were similar in both training sessions. In the HEROS-Remote training, 90% of the trainees were satisfied with CPR training, and 96% were satisfied with the delivery and found it convenient. CONCLUSION: HEROS-Remote training was non-inferior to conventional CPR training in terms of chest compression quality. Distance learning CPR training using a smartphone application and mannikin delivery had high user satisfaction and was logistically feasible.

Initial five and ten-minute regional cerebral oxygen saturation as a predictor of the futility of resuscitation for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest

This study aimed to investigate the usefulness of cerebral regional oxygen saturation (rSO2) during the initial 5 and 10 minutes of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) compared with an initial rSO2 and mean rSO2 during entire CPR to predict the futility of resuscitation for patients without of-hospital-cardiac arrest (OHCA). This was a prospective study involving 52 adult patients presenting in OHCA and whose cerebral rSO2 values were measured until either CPR was terminated or sustained return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) was achieved. Receiver operating characteristics analyses were used to evaluate which time and type of measurement is better to predict non-ROSC. The area under the curve (AUC) of each rSO2 value according to measurement time (overall, initial 5 minutes and 10 minutes) were the highest value of 0.743, 0.724, and 0.739, mean values of 0.724, 0.677 and 0.701 and rSO2 (Changes in values of regional cerebral oxygen) value of 0.722, 0.734 and 0.724, respectively, while all of the initial values had a poor AUC (<0.7) and also were not statistically significant. The optimal cut-off value of each rSO2 values during overall, initial 5 minutes and 10 minutes were the highest value of 26% (sensitivity, 53.9% specificity, 92.3%), 24% (sensitivity, 56.4% specificity, 92.3%), and 30% (sensitivity, 61.5% specificity, 84.6%), mean value of 15.2%, 15.3% and 16%, respectively. None of the patients with a persistent rSO2 <=18% during the overall period achieved ROSC. Initial 5 minutes and 10 minutes cerebral rSO2 values an out-of-hospital-cardiac arrest (OHCA) are a better predictor in deciding the futility of CPR, compared to initial and overall measurements.Copyright © 2023 The Author(s). Published by MRE Press.

Healthcare assistance to COVID-19 patient using internet of things (IoT) enabled technologies.

The IoT can lead to disruptive healthcare innovation. Research articles on IoT in healthcare and COVID-19 pandemics are thus researched in order to discover the potential of this technology. This literature-based research may help professionals to explore solutions to associated issues and battle the COVID-19 epidemic. Using a process diagram, IoT's significant accomplishments were briefly evaluated. Then seven critical IoT technologies that look useful in healthcare during the COVID-19 Pandemic are identified and illustrated. Finally, in the COVID-19 Pandemic, potential fundamental IoT applications were identified for the medical industry with a short explanation. The present predicament has opened up a fresh avenue to creativity in our everyday lives. The Internet of Things is an up-and-coming technology that enhances and gives better solutions in the medical area, such as appropriate medical record-keeping, sample, device integration, and cause of sickness. IoT's sensor-based technology gives a remarkable ability to lower the danger of intervention in challenging circumstances and is helpful for the pandemic type COVID-19. In the sphere of medicine, IoT's emphasis is on helping to treat diverse COVID-19 situations accurately. It facilitates the work of the surgeon by reducing risks and enhancing overall performance. Using this technology, physicians may readily identify changes in the COVID-19's vital parameters. These information-based services provide new prospects for healthcare as they advance towards the ideal technique for an information system to adapt world-class outcomes by improving hospital treatment systems. Medical students may now be better taught and led in the future for the identification of sickness. Proper use of IoT may assist handle several medical difficulties such as speed, affordability, and complexity appropriately. It may simply be adapted to track patients' calorific intake and therapy with COVID-19 asthma, diabetes, and arthritis. In COVID-19 pandemic days, this digitally managed health management system may enhance the overall healthcare performance.

Management of Intraoperative Cardiac Arrest.

Perioperative arrests are both uncommon and heterogeneous and have not been described or studied to the same extent as cardiac arrest in the community. These crises are usually witnessed, frequently anticipated, and involve a rescuer physician with knowledge of the patient's comorbidities and coexisting anesthetic or surgically related pathophysiology ultimately leading to better outcomes. This article reviews the most probable causes of intraoperative arrest and their management.

Validation of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation mortality prediction and severity of illness scores in an international COVID-19 cohort.

BACKGROUND: Veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (V-V ECMO) is a lifesaving support modality for severe respiratory failure, but its resource-intensive nature led to significant controversy surrounding its use during the COVID-19 pandemic. We report the performance of several ECMO mortality prediction and severity of illness scores at discriminating survival in a large COVID-19 V-V ECMO cohort. METHODS: We validated ECMOnet, PRESET (PREdiction of Survival on ECMO Therapy-Score), Roch, SOFA (Sequential Organ Failure Assessment), APACHE II (acute physiology and chronic health evaluation), 4C (Coronavirus Clinical Characterisation Consortium), and CURB-65 (Confusion, Urea nitrogen, Respiratory Rate, Blood Pressure, age >65 years) scores on the ISARIC (International Severe Acute Respiratory and emerging Infection Consortium) database. We report discrimination via Area Under the Receiver Operative Curve (AUROC) and Area under the Precision Recall Curve (AURPC) and calibration via Brier score. RESULTS: We included 1147 patients and scores were calculated on patients with sufficient variables. ECMO mortality scores had AUROC (0.58-0.62), AUPRC (0.62-0.74), and Brier score (0.286-0.303). Roch score had the highest accuracy (AUROC 0.62), precision (AUPRC 0.74) yet worst calibration (Brier score of 0.3) despite being calculated on the fewest patients (144). Severity of illness scores had AUROC (0.52-0.57), AURPC (0.59-0.64), and Brier Score (0.265-0.471). APACHE II had the highest accuracy (AUROC 0.58), precision (AUPRC 0.64), and best calibration (Brier score 0.26). CONCLUSION: Within a large international multicenter COVID-19 cohort, the evaluated ECMO mortality prediction and severity of illness scores demonstrated inconsistent discrimination and calibration highlighting the need for better clinically applicable decision support tools.

State Support for the Agrarian Sector in Russia: Problems and Solutions

The article analyzes the measures of state support for agriculture in the Russian Federation. State support of agrarian sector is a basic component of state-legal regulation of the sphere of agriculture and represents a totality of various forms and instruments of influence on social and economic life of society for the purpose of dynamic development of agrarian sphere. State support measures for agriculture are important in the in the presence of the COVID-19 pandemic. However, the goals and objectives formulated in the adopted and adopted by the supreme body of the executive power state programs for agricultural development often have problems with their financial support. Analysis of existing state support measures for agriculture has shown that some of them need improvement. Most of them are aimed mainly at large agricultural producers, leaving out small forms of farming. In the article, emphasis is placed on the need to improve the mechanism providing state support to the subjects of the agricultural industry through digital services throughout Russia. Subsidies, grants, soft loans and other support measures can be obtained electronically, which will make the process more transparent. © 2023, The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG.

Vaccination status and knowledge of CPR do not affect medical students' decision to perform BLS during the COVID-19 pandemic

Introduction: To address the risks of transmission by COVID-19, various recommendations been released by medical societies, which include strongly advocating for the use of personal protective equipment. In addition, hands-only cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) has also been promoted among cardiac arrest victims. Some studies which evaluated healthcare practitioners' attitudes towards CPR during the pandemic showed negative attitudes in responding to those who have unknown COVID-19 status citing safety as the primary reason. At present, there is no study which evaluates the attitudes of medical students towards Basic Life Support (BLS) during the pandemic. Purpose(s): The study aimed to determine the factors associated with willingness of medical students to perform basic life support in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest during the COVID-19 pandemic. Method(s): This is a cross-sectional study using online surveys. We performed face validation and pilot study on 39 medical students. The main survey was disseminated in Metro Manila schools wherein 349 medical students participated. Questions included demographic data, prior BLS training, and vaccination status, evaluated knowledge of CPR, and determined their attitudes on CPR during the pandemic. Result(s): Results showed that 338 (97%) were willing to do CPR during the pandemic. Majority are fully vaccinated (99%) and are BLS-trained (75%). The median total knowledge score was 7 out of 10. Of all participants, 37 (11%) had a perfect score. Most (79%) had a passing mark. Majority (61%) claimed that a victim's vaccination status does not play a role in deciding to perform CPR. Among the unwilling, 55% factored in a victim's vaccination status. Most who agreed to perform CPR will do so if they are provided with adequate protection (55%). Simple and multiple logistic regression analyses showed that students who will do CPR on a patient who is not fully vaccinated or has unknown vaccination status have about 5 times higher odds of having the will to perform BLS during the pandemic. It also found that there is no correlation between knowledge, vaccination status, and prior training with choosing to perform BLS during the pandemic. This means that if a student is willing to do CPR on a victim wherein chances of contracting COVID-19 infection are higher, then their likelihood of performing BLS regardless of victim status, during the pandemic is five times more likely. Conclusion(s): Most Filipino medical students are willing to perform BLS during the pandemic and in spite of risks of COVID-19 transmission. Their adequate knowledge, full vaccination status, or prior training did not influence their decision. In a pandemic situation, the students' willingness to perform CPR among those with unknown COVID-19 status influences their decision to perform BLS in general.

Public coping discourse in response to government health crisis communication

Purpose: This study aims to explore public coping strategies with government-imposed lockdown restrictions (i.e. forced compliance) due to a health crisis (i.e. COVID-19). This directly impacts the public's power, as they may feel alienated from their environment and from others. Consequently, this study explores the relationships between the public's power, quality of life and crisis-coping strategies. This is important to help governments understand public discourse surrounding perceived government health crisis communication, which aids effective policy development. Design/methodology/approach: An online questionnaire distributed via Qualtrics received 371 responses from the South African public and structural equation modelling was used to test the hypotheses. Findings: The results indicate the public's experience of powerlessness and resulting information-sharing, negative word-of-mouth and support-seeking as crisis coping strategies in response to government-imposed lockdown restrictions. Originality/value: The public's perspective on health crisis communication used in this study sheds light on adaptive and maladaptive coping strategies that the public employs due to the alienation they feel during a health crisis with government-forced compliance. The findings add to the sparse research on crisis communication from the public perspective in a developing country context and provide insights for governments in developing health crisis communication strategies. The results give insight into developing policies related to community engagement and citizen participation during a pandemic. © 2023, Melanie Wiese and Liezl-Marié Van Der Westhuizen.

Primary Cardiac Lymphoma with an Aggressive Hostile Take-Over

Background Primary cardiac lymphoma (PCL) is an extranodal lymphoma involving only the heart and/or pericardium. PCL accounts for 2% of primary cardiac tumors and 0.5% of extranodal lymphomas. Its diagnosis is usually delayed due to rarity and non-specific findings. Case A 77-year-old man with Alzheimer dementia, atrial fibrillation on apixaban, and COVID-19 illness 3-weeks prior, who presented to the hospital with diffuse abdominal discomfort, fatigue, anorexia, and hypoactivity. Patient was tachycardic and normotensive with pronounced jugular venous distention, non-collapsing with respiration. ECG revealed sinus tachycardia, first degree atrioventricular (AV) block and chronic LBBB. Cardiac troponins were mildly elevated without significant delta. An abdominopelvic CT revealed an incidental, large pericardial effusion (PE). Bedside echocardiogram confirmed a large hemodynamically significant PE as well as a mass-like echogenicity encasing and infiltrating the pericardium and myocardium at the basal aspect of the right ventricle free wall. Decision-making In view of recent COVID-19 infection, he was started on indomethacin and colchicine for suspected viral or neoplastic pericarditis. Pericardiocentesis drained 900ml of amber to serosanguineous fluid with quick hemodynamic improvement. Fluid analysis was non-diagnostic for neoplasia. Subsequently, he developed symptomatic bradycardia with an intermittent complete AV block with junctional escape rhythm, transitioning to a second-degree AV block after removal of beta-blocker. Awaiting permanent pacemaker implant, he developed ventricular fibrillation with sudden cardiac death that required prolonged unsuccessful ACLS. Autopsy revealed an extensive infiltrative tumor, predominantly right-sided, consistent with primary cardiac B-cell lymphoma. Conclusion PCL should be part of the working diagnosis in patients presenting with a pericardial effusive process in combination with a right sided myocardial mass. Early cardiac MRI/PET scan or biopsy should be considered when the diagnosis is not certain. Prompt diagnosis could allow for treatment that potentially prolongs survival.Copyright © 2023 American College of Cardiology Foundation

Association between days alive without life support/out of hospital and health-related quality of life.

BACKGROUND: Trials in critically ill patients increasingly focus on days alive without life support (DAWOLS) or days alive out of hospital (DAOOH) and health-related quality of life (HRQoL). DAWOLS and DAOOH convey more information than mortality and are simpler and faster to collect than HRQoL. However, whether these outcomes are associated with HRQoL is uncertain. We thus aimed to assess the associations between DAWOLS and DAOOH and long-term HRQoL. METHODS: Secondary analysis of the COVID STEROID 2 trial including adults with COVID-19 and severe hypoxaemia and the Handling Oxygenation Targets in the Intensive Care Unit (HOT-ICU) trial including adult intensive care unit patients with acute hypoxaemic respiratory failure. Associations between DAWOLS and DAOOH at day 28 and 90 and long-term HRQoL (after 6 or 12 months) using the EuroQol 5-dimension 5-level survey (EQ VAS and EQ-5D-5L index values) were assessed using flexible models and evaluated using measures of fit and prediction adequacy in both datasets (comprising internal performance and external validation), non-parametric correlation coefficients and graphical presentations. RESULTS: We found no strong associations between DAWOLS or DAOOH and HRQoL in survivors at HRQoL-follow-up (615 and 1476 patients, respectively). There was substantial variability in outcomes, and predictions from the best fitted models were poor both internally and externally in the other trial dataset, which also showed inadequate calibration. Moderate associations were found when including non-survivors, although predictions remained uncertain and calibration inadequate. CONCLUSION: DAWOLS and DAOOH were poorly associated with HRQoL in adult survivors of severe or critical illness included in the COVID STEROID 2 and HOT-ICU trials.

"I can't make all this work." End of life care provision in natural disasters: a qualitative study.

BACKGROUND: Natural disasters are becoming more frequent and severe and profoundly impact the end-of-life care experience, including service provision. There is a paucity of research examining healthcare workers' experiences in responding to care demands when disasters strike. This research aimed to fill this gap by exploring end-of-life care providers' perceptions of the impact of natural disasters on end-of-life care. METHODS: Between Feb 2021-June 2021 ten in-depth semi-structured interviews were conducted with healthcare professionals providing end-of-life care during recent natural disasters, COVID-19, and/or fires and floods. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed, and analysed using a hybrid inductive and deductive thematic approach. RESULTS: The overarching theme from the healthcare workers' accounts was of being unable to provide effective compassionate and quality care - "I can't make all this work." They spoke of the considerable burdens the system imposed on them, of being overextended and overwhelmed, having their roles overturned, and losing the human element of care for those at end-of-life. CONCLUSION: There is urgent need to pioneer effective solutions to minimise the distress of healthcare professionals in delivering end-of-life care in disaster contexts, and to improve the experience of those dying.

The Effectiveness of Online-Only Blended Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Training: Static-Group Comparison Study.

BACKGROUND: Basic life support (BLS) education is essential for improving bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) rates, but the imparting of such education faces obstacles during the outbreak of emerging infectious diseases, such as COVID-19. When face-to-face teaching is limited, distance learning-blended learning (BL) or an online-only model-is encouraged. However, evidence regarding the effect of online-only CPR training is scarce, and comparative studies on classroom-based BL (CBL) are lacking. While other strategies have recommended self-directed learning and deliberate practice to enhance CPR education, no previous studies have incorporated all of these instructional methods into a BLS course. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to demonstrate a novel BLS training model-remote practice BL (RBL)-and compare its educational outcomes with those of the conventional CBL model. METHODS: A static-group comparison study was conducted. It included RBL and CBL courses that shared the same paradigm, comprising online lectures, a deliberate practice session with Little Anne quality CPR (QCPR) manikin feedback, and a final assessment session. In the main intervention, the RBL group was required to perform distant self-directed deliberate practice and complete the final assessment via an online video conference. Manikin-rated CPR scores were measured as the primary outcome; the number of retakes of the final examination was the secondary outcome. RESULTS: A total of 52 and 104 participants from the RBL and CBL groups, respectively, were eligible for data analysis. A comparison of the 2 groups revealed that there were more women in the RBL group than the CBL group (36/52, 69.2% vs 51/104, 49%, respectively; P=.02). After adjustment, there were no significant differences in scores for QCPR release (96.9 vs 96.4, respectively; P=.61), QCPR depth (99.2 vs 99.5, respectively; P=.27), or QCPR rate (94.9 vs 95.5, respectively; P=.83). The RBL group spent more days practicing before the final assessment (12.4 vs 8.9 days, respectively; P<.001) and also had a higher number of retakes (1.4 vs 1.1 times, respectively; P<.001). CONCLUSIONS: We developed a remote practice BL-based method for online-only distant BLS CPR training. In terms of CPR performance, using remote self-directed deliberate practice was not inferior to the conventional classroom-based instructor-led method, although it tended to take more time to achieve the same effect. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Not applicable.

Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Providing Recommendations During Goals-of-Care Conversations: A Multisite Survey.

Background: Goals-of-care conversations (GoCCs) are essential for individualized end-of-life care. Shared decision-making (SDM) that elicits patients' goals and values to collaboratively make life sustaining treatment (LST) decisions is best practice. However, it is unknown how the COVID-19 pandemic onset and associated changes to care delivery, stress on providers, and clinical uncertainty affected SDM and recommendation-making during GoCCs. Aim: To assess providers' attitudes and behaviors related to GoCCs during the COVID-19 pandemic and identify factors associated with provision of LST recommendations. Design: Survey of United States Veterans Health Administration (VA) health care providers. Setting/Participants: Health care providers from 20 VA facilities with high COVID-19 caseloads early in the pandemic who had authority to place LST orders and practiced in select specialties (n = 3398). Results: We had 323 respondents (9.5% adjusted response rate). Most were age ≥50 years (51%), female (63%), non-Hispanic white (64%), and had ≥1 GoCC per week during peak-COVID-19 (78%). Compared with pre-COVID-19, providers believed it was less appropriate and felt less comfortable giving an LST recommendation during peak-COVID-19 (p < 0.001). One-third (32%) reported either "never" or "rarely" giving an LST recommendation during GoCCs at peak-COVID-19. In adjusted regression models, being a physician and discussing patients' goals and values were positively associated with giving an LST recommendation (B = 0.380, p = 0.031 and B = 0.400, p < 0.001, respectively) at peak-COVID-19. Conclusion: Providers who discuss patients' preferences and values are more likely to report giving a recommendation; both behaviors are markers of SDM during GoCCs. Our findings suggest potential areas for training in conducting patient-centered GoCCs.